The Claritin Lawsuit
Source:
Prescription
Access Litigation (PAL)
Schering-Plough (S-P) makes a family of the allergy drug products with a generic name loratadine - a 10 milligram Claritin tablet, Claritin-D with decongestant, Claritin Syrup Claritin-D 24 hour, and Claritin RediTabs. (collectively referred to here as "Claritin") In 2000, Claritin was the seventh-ranked prescription drug, with sales of approximately $1.7 billion. Total sales of the entire Claritin family accounted for nearly 30% of Schering's annual revenues, or $2.6 billion.
Direct-to-Consumer
(DTC) Advertising
DTC advertising by the pharmaceutical industry has been legal since
1985, but became more appealing to the industry in 1997 when the Food
and Drug Administration relaxed the standards for broadcast DTC advertisements.
DTC advertising expenditures have risen from $55 million in 1991 to
$2.5 billion in 2000. Such advertising greatly influences the purchasing
patterns of consumers. In one study, when asked how they would respond
if their physician refused a request for an advertised drug, 46% of
consumers said they would try to persuade their physician to prescribe
the medication despite a refusal. Product recognition of DTC-advertised
allergy drugs is particularly high. S-P engages in DTC advertising to
promote its products. In 2000 alone, S-P spent $111 million advertising
Claritin, making it the second most-advertised drug. A consequence of
the increased use of DTC advertising is the increase in the price of
prescription drugs. The average cost per prescription rose 11.6% in
1999. Claritin currently costs approximately $2.13 per pill in the U.S.,
or $80-$85 for a 1-month supply. Despite the high cost and the extensive
advertising, which inflates consumer expectations of product efficacy,
a sampling of studies sponsored by non-S-P entities indicates that between
39.1-60% of patients do not benefit from Claritin.
Background
on the Complaint
Member organizations of the Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project
are filing a class action litigation against Schering-Plough and its
advertisers, Commonhealth L.P. and Quantum Group (U.S.), Inc., for consumer
fraud violations in connection with its DTC advertising, promotion and
sale of Claritin products. In various forms of its widely distributed
DTC advertising materials, including print media, web site content,
and television advertisements, the complaint alleges, the manufacturer
and advertisers of Claritin products use and employ unconscionable commercial
practices, deception and knowing concealment.
They
do this, we claim, in part, by:
(1) falsely holding Claritin products out as effective for all users
when it is not; (2) failing to disclose the limited efficacy of Claritin
products in its DTC advertising; and (3) falsely holding Claritin products
out as effective for symptoms associated with seasonal allergies when
these symptoms may result from many non-allergic causes not addressed
by Claritin. The scale of this false and misleading advertising has
enabled S-P and its advertisers to manipulate the true market for Claritin
products, by unlawfully increasing its consumer demand, and thereby
unlawfully increasing the price paid for Claritin.

